www.Universe-Forum.com

[fiber]

Hypotheses of an origin of the Universe

The UNIVERSE was formed thanks to a sound


Two newest reviews of a known part of the Universe, presented at meeting of the American astronomical society, show, that external edges of the enormous sound waves dispersing every which way from epicentre of the Big bang, directly promoted formation of congestions of galaxies.
The theory which has been put forward still in 1960th years said, that is primary after the Big bang the Universe represented a dense viscous substance (that, has proved to be true recently experimentally), light did not leave for its limits.
Later 350 thousand years after the Big bang, light at last, has fallen outside the limits this substance and has started to extend in surrounding space. The residual luminescence known under the name "a space microwave background", remains till now.
According to astronomers, with a sound there should be something similar. In "a primary hot substance" the sound should extend approximately the same method as now extends in water or gases, i.e., in a substance wave mode.
Accordingly, the numerous sound waves generated by the Big bang, - were parts where the matter considerable quantity accumulated.
After "dispersion" of a primary hot viscous substance, there were massive clots of substance - congestions of galaxies - under the form corresponding to those sound waves (as they just are their material representation).



Considering mythological representation that the world is created by a sound, and creation by the Word (the sounding!) - a special case of it, the similar information of astronomers it is especially interesting!)

[SERGIO]

Yes, it simply one more (become by opening for people) the proof of that the world both has been created so! Also there is here nothing mythical (unless for consciousness of people), Materialization thought of the Creator, the creation a word (thought, a sound) at physical level occurred how it open and still astronomers, etc. scientists will open.
There is no contradiction of scientific data with idea of creation. Simply each first day of creation is not the first day in our understanding. So it is interesting to open this new (thanks to a science) and to find confirmation of creation and to admire with the Creator!
Thanks for info

[Roiglobal]

Here it is possible to hear sounds of comets and the companions, interesting sounds make different companions http://www.spacesounds.com/navigator/index.html

[Ragoo]

Well and a theme you have lifted

[Roiglobal]

The most widespread hypothesis of an origin of the Universe is the hypothesis of the big bang. Any hypothesis does not answer a question that was BEFORE big bang.

[Ragoo]

I think clots of a dark matter

[Roiglobal]

And whence it has appeared?. Dark, it is absorbing light or it simply not letting out because of the super-critical concentration of weight in one place a matter?

[*Orange*]

For me it is one of the main riddles... hypothesis B.b. cannot be considered correct, as really it is said nothing that was BEFORE! As has told Ragoo, "I think clots of a dark matter" But after all the matter too somewhere was. And what was around, she whence was formed?... It is a lot of questions

[Dina]

I think that the Universe always was. Always and eternally... Simply I assume. I still badly represent eternity because the end at all should be. Simply suddenly the Universe is more than everything?? And still, if at all the end is, it will be fair to tell that all then will return to an initial stage. Correctly? Correctly ) Means the end at all will not be, and if there will be no end, there was no also a beginning... All Means it was simple.

[Ragoo]

"Everything, that has the beginning has also the end" the concept of a film the Matrix.
Here variants (very short):
1. Has the beginning and has the end.
2. Has no beginning but has the end.
3. Has the beginning but has no end.
Excuse for brevity of a statement.

[Ragoo]

In general at me on the importance, here what hypotheses of an origin of the Universe:
1. A hypothesis of a dark matter.
2. A hypothesis of a mechanical origin of all Universe (I.Kant, a class - scientifically-cosmogonic).
3. A hypothesis red shift (astrophysical).
4. A "super-force" hypothesis
In general Roiglobal, this theme can be discussed for years, and can also centuries, yet we will not prove the most probable Hypotheses of an origin of the Universe.

[Ragoo]

Roiglobal we later, will discuss a hypothesis of a dark matter as now I have no time.

[Roiglobal]

OK.At me too hot a time.

[Ormin van Bung]

THE UNIVERSE IS OUR REASON, EVERYTHING, THAT WE SEE, WE FEEL, WE THINK ETC.
THE REASON DOES NOT EXIST IS AS IN THE COMPUTER - THE VIRTUAL REALITY.

[Roiglobal]

THE UNIVERSE IS OUR REASON, EVERYTHING, THAT WE SEE, WE FEEL, WE THINK ETC.
THE REASON DOES NOT EXIST IS AS IN THE COMPUTER - THE VIRTUAL REALITY.

From here a conclusion: the Universe does not exist, and we do not exist =))).